The most compliant reputation software — no review gating, no risk of your Google Business Profile being taken down or reported by competitors or customers.

LocalReviewDesk

Legal · Accessibility

Accessibility Statement

Last reviewed 2026-08-02← Back to home

What we aim for, what we have actually done, and — just as importantly — what we know is still wrong. If something here stops you using LocalReviewDesk, we want to hear about it.

Our commitment

LocalReviewDesk is used by business owners and by their customers, often on a phone, at a counter, in a hurry. We work towards the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 at Level AA as our target standard.

A target is not the same as an achievement, so the rest of this page is specific about the difference.

Conformance status

What follows is a description of the measures we have taken and the barriers we currently know about. It is based on our own review of the code, not on third-party testing or assistive-technology user testing.

What this covers

This statement applies to:

  • The public marketing site, including the blog and guides.
  • The signed-in dashboard used by business owners.
  • The customer-facing review pages we host on behalf of businesses.

It does not cover third-party destinations we link to. In particular, choosing to leave a public review takes the customer to Google, whose accessibility is Google’s responsibility, not ours.

What we've done

  • Pages are built from semantic HTML with a declared page language, so screen readers announce structure and pronunciation correctly.
  • Interactive components that are not native controls — accordions, dialogs, menus, tab lists — carry ARIA state such as aria-expanded, aria-controls, aria-current and aria-modal, and are operable from the keyboard.
  • Interactive elements have visible focus indicators rather than suppressed outlines.
  • Status changes that happen without a page load are announced via live regions.
  • Images that carry meaning have text alternatives; decorative imagery is hidden from assistive technology.
  • The demo video plays only on request — it does not autoplay — and exposes standard browser controls.

Known limitations

These are the gaps we are aware of today. We would rather list them than imply they do not exist.

  • Reduced-motion preferences are not respected.The site uses smooth scrolling and animated transitions, and does not currently honour the operating-system “reduce motion” setting.
  • There is no skip-to-content link. Keyboard and screen-reader users must move through the navigation on every page before reaching the main content.
  • Colour contrast on a review page depends on the business. Business owners choose a brand colour for their own review page, and we do not currently enforce a minimum contrast ratio against it. A poorly chosen colour can produce text that is hard to read.
  • The demo video has no captions. It has no spoken narration to caption, but no captions or text alternative are provided, which does not meet WCAG 1.2.2.
  • No automated accessibility testing runs in CI. Regressions are currently caught by review rather than by tooling.

We are not committing to a fix date for these, because we would rather publish an honest list than a schedule we might miss. They are tracked, and this page is updated as they close.

Reporting a barrier

If any part of LocalReviewDesk is difficult or impossible for you to use, email support@localreviewdesk.com. Telling us the page, what you were trying to do, and the browser or assistive technology you were using helps, but is not required — report it however is easiest for you.

We aim to acknowledge accessibility reports within five business days. If a barrier stops you completing something time-sensitive, say so and we will look at it sooner and find you another way through in the meantime.

Reviewing this statement

This statement was last reviewed on 2026-08-02. We revise it when a listed limitation is fixed, when a new one is found, or when the site changes materially — whichever comes first.